Handling Violations of Competition Laws in Vietnam

Foreign brands are increasingly popular in the Vietnam market as Vietnam economy integrates into world economy. The openings of economy creates opportunities to attract foreign investment into Vietnam through establishment of companies. To continue to protect the fair competition, and interest of consumer, it is important that the Vietnam state authority ensures the business environment. Accordingly, violations related to competition will be handled in accordance with the law.

 

Dispute lawyers in Vietnam

Acts of violation of competition under Vietnam laws are defined in Article 1 of Decree 71/2014 / ND-CP, including: violations of regulations on control of acts of restraint of competition; acts of violating regulations on acts of unfair competition; violations of other provisions of law on competition. According to the provisions of law, the above acts shall be subject to the forms of punishment and fine. The most common and most powerful impact on businesses and consumers are the violation of unfair competition.

In practice, there are a number of instances where unfair competition acts are associated with intellectual property rights violations, which have a significant impact on business activities of enterprises in the same field; violation of business secrets; activities of advertising that are prohibited i.e. make direct comparison against competitor, provide falsified or confused information to consumers…

If committed acts of unfair competition, the violator will be subject to fine level from VND 10,000,000 to VND 140,000,000. At the same time, additional measures and remedies will be applied, depending on the seriousness of the breach, such as the revocation of the enterprise registration certificate; deprivation of the right to use licenses or practice certificates; confiscation of material evidences and means used to commit the violation, including the confiscation of profits earned from the commission of the violation; to restructure the enterprise, rectify to the public…

From the management of state authority, the detection and handling of unfair competition acts create conditions for enterprises to have equal opportunities in the market economy. From the enterprise’s perspective, it is important to continuously review its business activities in Vietnam to ensure compliance to competition law by its lawyers.

ANT Lawyers – a  law firm in Vietnam with international standard, local expertise and strong international network. We focus on customers’ needs and provide clients with a high quality legal advice and services. For advice or services request, please contact us via email ant@antlawyers.vn, or call us +84 24 730 86 529

 

Read More

Several Noted Points on Law Competition of 2018 in Vietnam

Vietnam Law on Competition has been adopted and will be effective on July 1st, 2019. The competition law of 2018 has changed in comparison with the Law on Competition 2004.  These changes are fundamental which enterprises should be aware of when entering into Vietnam through M&A activities. Competition lawyer should be consulted for update and development to avoid non-compliance.

Competition Lawyers in Vietnam

Firstly, the Competition Law 2018 gave up regulations on the limit of acts of economic concentration. Accordingly, Article 30 prohibits an enterprise from conducting economic concentration that has the potential to cause significant adverse effects on competition in the Vietnamese market. Contrary to previous regulations, Competition Law 2004 prohibits economic concentration if the combined market share of enterprises participating in economic concentration accounted for more than 50% in the relevant market.

Secondly, the Competition Law 2018 under Article 112 provides clemency policy for enterprises violating competition regulations. Accordingly, enterprises which voluntarily declare to help the National Competition Committee detect, investigate and deal with prohibited competition restriction acts will be exempted or reduced penalties according to the leniency policy. The leniency policy is applicable to no more than three first enterprises applying for leniency to the National Competition Commission.

Thirdly, unlike the Competition Law 2004, the Competition Law 2018 specifies the maximum fine for violations of competition law.

For organization:

–Violating regulations on the acts of economic concentration: a maximum fine of 5% of the total turnover of the business on the relevant market.

–Violating regulations on unfair competition: a fine of up to VND 2 billion

–Violation of other regulations: up to 200 million VND.

For individual, the fine level is 50% of the organization’s level.

Fourth, on threshold of economic concentration. The Competition Law 2004 stipulated that for centrally-run enterprises with a market share of between 30% and 50% in the relevant market, the competition authority must notify the competition authority before conducting the economic concentration. At present, the Competition Law 2018 is not regulated specifically as above, but only the notification threshold of economic concentration is determined based on one of four criteria as following:

-Total assets on the Vietnamese market of enterprises participating in economic concentration;

-The total turnover in the Vietnamese market of enterprises participating in economic concentration;

-Transaction value of economic concentration;

-Market share in the relevant market of enterprises participating in economic concentration.

Finally, new regulation on the time limit for dealing with a breach of competition law. Previously, to solve and deal with cases of economic concentration violation, it is necessary to undertake a preliminary investigation and formal investigation. In particular, the preliminary investigation is 30 days; formal investigation is 60 days with unfair competition; 180 days with the agreement restriction competition, economic concentration. Competition Law 2018 no longer stipulates two phases of the above investigation, but only that the investigation period is 09 months for restricted competition; 90 days with economic concentration; 60 days with unfair competition cases.

ANT Lawyers is a law firm in Vietnam located in the business centers of Hanoi, Danang, Ho Chi Minh city. We provide convenient access to our clients. Please contact our lawyers in Vietnam for advice via email ant@antlawyers.vn or call our office at +84 28 730 86 529.

Read More

US Anti-Dumping and Countervailing Duty Petitions of Tire Products From Vietnam

On May 13, 2020, The United States Department of Commerce (“DOC”) has received an investigation request for anti-dumping and countervailing measures against passenger and light truck tires (“PVLT tires”) originating from Korea, Taiwan-China, Thailand and Vietnam. The madatory respondents being US importers have also consulted with anti-dumping and countervailing duty lawyers in Vietnam and US to prepare for the investigation cooperation.

In this case, the plaintiff alleges that the tires under investigation were dumped and subsidized into the United States market, causing significant damage to the domestic manufacturing industry. In 2015, the same petitioner succeeded in securing anti-dumping and countervailing duties on PVLT tires from China.

The scope of these investigations is passenger vehicle and light truck tires. Passenger vehicle and light truck tires are new pneumatic tires, of rubber, with a passenger vehicle or light truck size designation. Tires covered by these orders may be tube-type, tubeless, radial, or nonradial, and they may be intended for sale to original equipment manufacturers or the replacement market. The products covered by the investigations are currently classified under the following Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (“HTSUS”) subheadings: 4011.10.10.10, 4011.10.10.20, 4011.10.10.30, 4011.10.10.40, 4011.10.10.50, 4011.10.10.60, 4011.10.10.70, 4011.10.50.00, 4011.20.10.05, and 4011.20.50.10.  The scope could also include tires entering under HTSUS subheadings 4011.90.10.10, 4011.90.10.50, 4011.90.20.10, 4011.90.20.50, 4011.90.80.10, 4011.90.80.50, 8708.70.45.30, 8708.70.45.46, 8708.70.45.48, 8708.70.45.80, 8708.70.60.30, 8708.70.60.45, and 8708.70.60.60.

Petitioner alleges the following dumping margins: 45.95% to 195.20% for South Korea, 21% to 102% for Taiwan, 106.4% to 217.5% for Thailand, and 14.73% to 33.06% for Vietnam. The petitions also detail numerous government subsidies benefitting Vietnamese tire producers, including loans, tax breaks, and grants. PVLT tire imports from these four countries shot up nearly 20% from 2017 to 2019, reaching 85.3 million tires, valued at 4.4 billion dollars, last year.

According to data from the United States International Trade Commission (“USITC”), the export value of Vietnam’s investigated products to the United States market reached 12.1 million dollars in 2019, accounting for about 6.7% of total United States imports of this product.

In Vietnam, the product under investigation is a product that has been warned by the Ministry of Industry and Trade of risks of foreign investigation by applying trade remedies measures from July 2019 with a high level of warning. Therefore, in the past time, the Ministry of Industry and Trade has actively coordinated and worked with associations and exporters to the United States to actively capture information and respond in case of initiating an investigation. Under United States regulations, the DOC will consider initiating an investigation of the case within 20 days of receiving it. In the event that the DOC decides to initiate an investigation, the Ministry of Industry and Trade of Vietnam will closely coordinate with export associations and enterprises in investigating the case and have timely support and treatment measures to protect the legitimate rights and interests of Vietnamese enterprises.

Vietnam international trade lawyers in competition, and anti-dumping practice will need to be involved with the process including data collection and possibly initial drafting of questionnaire responses in cooperation with US anti-dumping and countervailing duty lawyers to defend the case.

Read More

Several Noted Points on Law Competition of 2018

On Jun 12th,2018, The National Assembly promulgated Competition Law which will take effect from July 1st, 2019 and replace the Competition Law 2004. According to Article 3.9, violation of regulations on economic concentration is one of three signs of violation of competition law.

Firstly, economic concentration includes the following forms: (1) Merger of enterprises; (2) Consolidation of enterprises; (3) Acquisition of enterprises; (4) Joint venture between/among enterprises; (5) Other forms of economic concentration under regulation of the laws (Article 29). Subject carrying out activities of economic concentration is enterprises and the purpose of economic concentration is to gain control the objective enterprises and to govern the market to a certain extent.

Secondly, economic concentration shall be prohibited if it makes or potentially makes significant competition-restraining impact on the Vietnamese market. Specifically, the National Competition Commission shall assess the impact or ability making significant competition-restraining impact of economic concentration based on the following factors: (1) Combined market share of enterprises engaging in the economic concentration on the relevant market; (2) The degree of concentration on the relevant market before and after the economic concentration; (3) The relationship of the enterprises engaging in the economic concentration in the production, distribution or supply chain for a certain kind of goods/service or the business lines of the enterprises engaging in the economic concentration which are inputs or complementary to one another; (4) Competitive advantage brought about by economic concentration in the relevant market; (5) The ability of enterprises after the economic concentration for increasing significantly their prices or Return on sales; (6) The ability of enterprises after the economic concentration for removing or preventing other enterprises from market entry or expansion; (7) Particular factors in the sectors, areas which enterprises are engaging in economic concentration.

Thirdly, enterprises engaging in the economic concentration shall submit notification dossier of economic concentration to the National Competition Commission before initiating economic concentration if they reach the threshold of economic concentration notification. The notification threshold shall be determined based on one of the following criterias: (1) Total assets of the enterprises engaging in the economic concentration on the Vietnamese market; (2) Total turnover of enterprises engaging in the economic concentration on the Vietnamese market; (3) The transaction value of the economic concentration; (4) Combined market share of enterprises engaging in the economic concentration on the relevant market. For efficient preparation of dossiers, the consultation with M&A lawyers, anti competition lawyer are suggested.

Fourthly, regarding assessment procedure, the National Competition Commission shall receive notification dossier of economic concentration, preliminarily assess the economic concentration. Matters of preliminary assessment of economic concentration include: (1) Combined market share of enterprises engaging in the economic concentration on the relevant market; (2) The degree of concentration on the relevant market before and after the economic concentration; (3) The relationship of the enterprises engaging in the economic concentration in the production, distribution or supply chain for a certain kind of goods, service or the business lines of the enterprises engaging in the economic concentration which are inputs or complementary to one another. Within 7 working days from receipt of notification dossier of economic concentration, the National Competitive Commission shall notify the applicant in writing that whether the dossier is complete and valid. If the dossier is incomplete or invalid, the National Competition Commission shall notify the applicant in writing of specific content needed to amend, supplement within 30 days from the date of notice. Upon expiry of 30 days, if no amendment, supplementation is made or the dossier is not amended, supplemented completely at request, the National Competition Commission shall return the notification dossier.

After preliminary assessment of economic concentration, the National Competition Commission shall officially assess the economic concentration within 90 days from the date of notice of preliminary assessment result. In complicated cases, the National Competition Commission may extend the time limit of official assessment but it can not exceed 60 days and inform in writing enterprises submitting the notification dossier of economic concentration. Matters of official assessment of economic concentration include: (1) Assessing the impact or ability making significant competition-restraining impact of economic concentration; (2) Assessing the positive impact of economic concentration; (3) Assessing generally the ability making competition-restraining impact and ability making positive impact of economic concentration to. In process of official assessment of economic concentration, the National Competition Commission require the enterprise to submit notification dossier of economic concentration in order to supplement information, documents but this does not exceed 2 times. The enterprise submitting notification dossier of economic concentration shall be responsible for supplementing the information, documents relating to economic concentration and be responsible for the completeness and accuracy of such information, documents at the request of the National Competition Commission. This supplementation duration shall not be included in the time limit for assessing economic concentration. If the enterprise fails to supplement fully information, documents or supplement incompletely information, documents at request, the National Competition Commission shall consider, decide on the basis of available information, documents.

The fifth matter is right, responsibility and authority of the parties. In process of assessing economic concentration, the National Competition Commission is entitled to consult the bodies managing sectors, areas which enterprises are engaging in operating economic concentration, consult other relevant enterprises, organizations, and individuals; be responsible for ensuring confidentiality of information, documents provided under regulations of the laws; has the authority to handle complaints against decisions on settlement of violations against regulations on economic concentration. The consulted bodies are responsible for responding to consulted  matters in writing within 15 days from the date on which the request for consultation made by the National Competition Commission is received. Relevant bodies, organizations, and individuals is responsible for fully, accurately and promptly providing information, documents at request of the National Competition Commission in the process of assessing economic concentration unless otherwise stipulated.

Sixthly, regarding decision on economic concentration, after and based on the official assessment of economic concentration, the National Competition Commission shall issue a decision determining that: (1) The economic concentration is approved. This decision shall be sent to enterprises engaging in economic concentration within 5 working days from the date of issue; (2) the economic concentration is conditional; (3) the economic concentration is prohibited. If the National Competition Commission issues a decision behind schedule which causes damage to enterprises, it shall compensate for such damage under regulation of the laws. Decision on economic concentration shall be announced, except for the matter relating to State secrets or trade secrets.

Seventhly, conditional economic concentration is economic concentration which is approved and it shall meet one or more of the following conditions: (1) Division, split, resale of a part of capital contribution and property of enterprises engaging in economic concentration; (2) Control of the matters relating to the purchase and sale prices of goods, services or other trading conditions in contracts of enterprises formed after the economic concentration; (3) Other measure for remedying the ability making competition-restraining impact on the market; (4) Other measures for enhancing the positive impact of economic concentration.

Finally, violations against regulations on economic concentration includes the following violations: (1) An enterprise fails to notify of economic concentration; (2) An enterprise implements economic concentration without receiving a notification of preliminary assessment from the National Competition Commission; (3) An enterprise in cases of official assessment implements economic concentration before the National Competition Commission issues a decision; (4) An enterprise fails to perform or incompletely perform conditions specified in the decision on economic concentration; (5) An enterprise implements economic concentration which is prohibited.

For consultation, we at ANT Lawyers, a law firm in Vietnam will be available for legal help.

Read More